refactor: remove unused hierarchy readers

This commit is contained in:
Philipinho
2026-09-02 12:54:51 +01:00
parent 039bd2427d
commit 33e3287d74
2 changed files with 0 additions and 122 deletions
@@ -255,67 +255,6 @@ export class ShareService {
};
}
async getShareAncestorPage(
ancestorPageId: string,
childPageId: string,
): Promise<any> {
let ancestor = null;
try {
ancestor = await this.db
.withRecursive('page_ancestors', (db) =>
db
.selectFrom('pages')
.select([
'id',
'slugId',
'title',
'parentPageId',
'spaceId',
(eb) =>
eb
.case()
.when(eb.ref('id'), '=', ancestorPageId)
.then(true)
.else(false)
.end()
.as('found'),
])
.where(isValidUUID(childPageId) ? 'id' : 'slugId', '=', childPageId)
.unionAll((exp) =>
exp
.selectFrom('pages as p')
.select([
'p.id',
'p.slugId',
'p.title',
'p.parentPageId',
'p.spaceId',
(eb) =>
eb
.case()
.when(eb.ref('p.id'), '=', ancestorPageId)
.then(true)
.else(false)
.end()
.as('found'),
])
.innerJoin('page_ancestors as pa', 'pa.parentPageId', 'p.id')
// Continue recursing only when the target ancestor hasn't been found on that branch.
.where('pa.found', '=', false),
),
)
.selectFrom('page_ancestors')
.selectAll()
.where('found', '=', true)
.limit(1)
.executeTakeFirst();
} catch (err) {
// empty
}
return ancestor;
}
/**
* Resolve transclusion content for a public share viewer. Each requested
* source page must itself be reachable via the share graph (its own share
@@ -1158,67 +1158,6 @@ export class PagePermissionRepo {
return results.map((r) => r.parentPageId);
}
/**
* Get all page IDs within a subtree that are restricted OR are descendants of restricted pages.
* Used to filter pages from public shares - if a page is restricted, it and all its
* children should be hidden.
*/
async getRestrictedSubtreeIds(rootPageId: string): Promise<string[]> {
const results = await this.db
.withRecursive('descendants', (qb) =>
qb
.selectFrom('pages')
.select(['pages.id as descendantId', 'pages.parentPageId'])
.where('pages.id', '=', rootPageId)
.unionAll((eb) =>
eb
.selectFrom('pages')
.innerJoin(
'descendants',
'descendants.descendantId',
'pages.parentPageId',
)
.select(['pages.id as descendantId', 'pages.parentPageId'])
.where('pages.deletedAt', 'is', null),
),
)
.withRecursive('descendantAncestors', (qb) =>
qb
.selectFrom('descendants')
.innerJoin('pages', 'pages.id', 'descendants.descendantId')
.select([
'descendants.descendantId',
'pages.id as ancestorId',
'pages.parentPageId as ancestorParentId',
])
.unionAll((eb) =>
eb
.selectFrom('pages')
.innerJoin(
'descendantAncestors',
'descendantAncestors.ancestorParentId',
'pages.id',
)
.select([
'descendantAncestors.descendantId',
'pages.id as ancestorId',
'pages.parentPageId as ancestorParentId',
]),
),
)
.selectFrom('descendantAncestors')
.innerJoin(
'pageAccess',
'pageAccess.pageId',
'descendantAncestors.ancestorId',
)
.select('descendantAncestors.descendantId')
.distinct()
.execute();
return results.map((r) => r.descendantId);
}
/**
* Given a pageId and a set of candidate userIds, return the subset who can
* access the page (have permission on ALL restricted ancestors).